What the fuck?!

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/03/2 … 79509.html

One question few seem to be asking though is who on earth would want Hitler’s hairstyle? :roll:

Also, is it wrong I have a very strong urge to replace this ad’s photo with so many different dark eroge CG? :twisted:

http://www.foxnews.com/us/2012/03/26/of … ing-viral/

Apparently the Sunday school of today is quite different from when I was growing up:

http://www.fox43.com/news/wpmt-dauphin- … 4810.story

You’d have heard about it, because I would go all the way to the Supreme Court to fight it. I don’t have anything illegal in my possession.

Would anyone here push the button again?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=316AzLYf … r_embedded

Good to know.I’d love to see all anti-loli laws overturned.Well that was only one possibility.The other was that you’d been in an accident like a car crash.Glad your OK though.Is there a specific reason you hardly posted for so long? Or were you just busy?

On topic:
http://www.worldstarhiphop.com/videos/v … 1MzjBcZ4sZ

Why do people do/film things like this? :?

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qwStjAS9xTY

Roads? roads are for pussies. 8)

Major translation project at work. Was also working on various personal projects.

Will probably happen again in the near future. Another Japanese to Korean document has my name on it…

Here’s a one man crime spree for this history books:

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/1 … 15407.html

This is certainly a futile effort:

http://consumerist.com/2012/05/united-k … sites.html

Talk about life imitating art:

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/vi … o-Fruition

Didn’t know the BBC were Halo fans:

http://www.screwattack.com/news/bbc-use … ncil-story

Japan intends to make youtube viewing illegal:

http://www.escapistmagazine.com/news/vi … be-Illegal

I can see this going down. Someone from Japan calling LAX.
“Excuse me, we see that one of our Japanese Citizens is viewing a copyright Youtube video and we need you to arrest them.”

Ya know, I like to consider myself a really tolerant person. I don’t judge people for having weird beliefs or fetishes, so long as they don’t commit criminal activity or try to restrict the freedom of others. However the one thing I do hate, is people who try to revise history or the truth, when trying to pass them as the real thing. I bring this up, because I was in a seminar about women equality (a job mandatory thing). So the lecturer ¬ñ who was a woman ¬ñ was explaining how men being superior to women in anything was false. Well that bothered me, because that statement was false.

I foolishly raised my hand, she called on me to speak, and I said, “Men are physically superior to women in general athletic performance.” She smiled and said that was false, giving examples of how women in the Olympics could out perform most men on the planet. “True,” I replied, “but comparing an Olympic woman to a regular person, is as fair as comparing an Olympic man to a regular person. Among Olympians: the fastest, the strongest, the most endurable: all record holders belong to men. We can all go look it up on Wikipedia.”

Oh boy, did that get her livid. She was rambling on all sorts of things that, quite frankly, made no sense to me. Now I thought I was alone on this, but then another man in the crowd pipped up, and then stated that while there were strong Queens in the past, until people because more enlightened, women were living under the heel of men because men were physically stronger and used brute force to keep women in line. In fact, there are entire nations where women still are, because they haven’t accepted this enlightenment.

The lecture then stated that men have always held more guns and swords than women.

I then voiced again and said, “Okay… if you want to simplify it that way, sure. But in a battle between equally trained armies of men versus women: men will repeatedly prove they can march further, carry more supplies, and manually pull more equipment than women. That’s a massive tactical advantage, unless the woman army has superior leadership over the man army.”

She threw me and the other guy out. I was mildly surprised to see that about another half dozen men got up and left with us. So we all walked to a bar across the street and increased our male chauvinism.

Now don’t get me wrong: I don’t think that men are superior to women in terms of social status. Women can be or do whatever they want… but to outright ignore that there are things men are superior in to women (and vice versa) is pure ignorance. I don’t want they’d call that… sexual prejudice? I know that the woman’s job and the point of the lecture, was to teach that men should treat women as equals, and I’m all for that… but to say men aren’t superior in something? That’s only discrediting the argument. There’s centuries of documented sports, biological research, and just plain human history that show men have an advantage when it comes down to physical attributes outside of actual child birthing.

And we can sit down and argue “new evidence” than women are equal to men in body performance, because they have an unfair population pool to base research off, but does not explain why the physically fit men could regularly outperform the physically fit women in the various military commands I’ve served in the past… unless… GASP… that’s just how it actually is in real life (because the military uses extensive population pool standardization for enlistment – aka Boot Camp). Or the women were just holding back, were ordered to hold back, or didn’t train as hard as the men. :roll: There’s reasons why men aren’t culturally and legally allowed to hit women in most Westernized nations, but physical strikes between man-versus-man or woman-versus-woman aren’t seen in the same negative light.

I HATE revisionism.

Some issues become political and when an issue is political the only data that matters is data that supports the conclusion you’ve already made. All other data is irrelevant or simply untrue. When you wander into an issue without realising that for someone else it is political, nothing you present will sway that person’s perception.

I feel you on that, Narg. I’m all for gender equality and I consider myself a feminist, but I absolutely hate when people deny facts to fit their agenda. I hope you didn’t get in any serious trouble over it.

Australian Police are asking if you’ve seen these tits. :stuck_out_tongue:

http://www.stuff.co.nz/oddstuff/7209634 … ng-robbery

I wish. :wink:

Dear cosplayers… for the sake of my sanity and those of others like me, please abide by these rules (there may be others):

#1: Please cosplay in the character’s general weight class. The last thing anyone wants to see is a 300 pound Sailor Moon.

#2: Please cosplay in your own sex. The last thing anyone wants to see is a hairy male Sailor Moon.

#3: Please cosplay in the character’s general age class (or at least look it). The last thing anyone wants to see is a decrepit 90 year old Sailor Moon.

#4: If you’re a guy and wearing tights, please wear a cup. Batman and Superman obviously do.

Thank you.

What have you got against Sailor Bubba? He’s become kind of the unofficial mascot of the ACen not-legally-allowed-to-call-it-security department.

No mention of man Faye? lol

Boy Scouts are going to still refuse gay membership:

http://www.cnn.com/2012/07/17/us/boy-sc … ?hpt=hp_t2

That is insulting on multiple levels. Why? Because it means they are just affirming that gay scout leaders are pedophiles. Think on that for a moment.

How does an orientation for same-sex, equate to liking children? There’s no such thing as heterosexual pedophiles? Oh… wait…

For that matter: how does keeping it a secret make anyone more safe if that was the case? Oh… wait…

And why the hell are pedophiles considered sex offenders? One does not equate to the other. There are sex offenders who aren’t pedophiles. Schizophrenia does it for example. Oh… wait…

Anyways… blah… my major beef is the Boy Scouts officially discriminate on creed, but still get Federal support. The KKK officially discriminates on creed too. Why not fund them while were at it. KKK should take it to the Supreme Court. Oh… wait…

Did you know I’m a lesbian in a man’s body? Does that make me ineligible for the Boy Scouts? :stuck_out_tongue: