If I remember correctly, one of the things that G8 wanted to do is pass a law that will make websites* answerable to international law and not to their local laws. Example, pirate bay will not longer be able to say “we are legal in the country we are operating from” but instead will be forced to shutdown and the operators will be fined. Japan was one of the countries that supported this, because they are losing a lot of revenue in the anime market.
I don’t know what have come of that talk (it should have happened last year), but I guess (my guess) that they didn’t agree on how the law to be implemented**.
- by websites, they singled out p2p trackers that generated revenue from advertisements, but again they are passing a law and not targeting certain websites.
** example, the BNP party in the UK might be legal in the British legal system, but in many places (including the UN) it might be deemed illegal. So what should happen, protect the freedom of speech or follow the international law?
P.S. reminder, am not a lawyer and I am just typing from what I remember I read sometime ago.