Making more things illegal won’t stop people. To stop people from doing something, you have to stop them from wanting to do it.
Say this stupid (and I’m sorry, but it IS stupid) bill passes and all new devices must have protection built in. Ignoring the practicality aspects of doing that completely, since I’m not a techie - what good would it do? Do you think everyone who currently owns a computer is going to throw it away and buy a new one that will do less than their current machine?
I have nothing against the development of secure media. Obviously it would be a good thing for game companies to try and develop a kind of media that can’t be copied - and I say ‘game’ rather than ‘software’ because with general software applications, people would not be happy if they were required to leave the SecureCD in the drive all the time for each program they were trying to use. For a game, people are willing to go this far.
But trying to cripple every function at every processing step to prevent any illicit use - well, it’s either impossible or it removes half the functionality of the computer. Sure, you can stop users from copying your files - just prevent them from copying files at all! And don’t forget to prevent them from creating files, because after all if they can create them they can reproduce data in them.
The bill is moronic. Yes, consumers need to recognise the rights of creators and not simply steal everything that suits their fancy. Likewise, businesses also need to recognise the rights of consumers. Products need to allow reasonable functionality. Copyright holders need to have a use-it-or-lose-it clause to prevent people from sitting on things and barring anyone else’s attempts to distribute it if they have no intention of distributing it themselves.
Compensation, not control. Creators (and sponsoring businesses) should be compensated for the use of their products. They should not be allowed to maintain complete control over the use of the products.