quote:
Originally posted by perigee:
Those who think this 'opens the door' to private space travel probably don't have a clue about the enormous differences in hardware and logistical requirements for suborbital vs orbital flight. The public feels that it has been oversold on the benefits of manned space flight. Something like this gets classified as a stunt.[This message has been edited by perigee (edited 06-23-2004).]
I don't know about that, the same could have been said and might have been about the Wright Brothers first flight. Yes the difference is space travel somewhat exists now and flight did not as such then, but in truth that first flight of thiers was a stunt and eventually lead to other things like overseas air travel, it took a while but it happened.
In truth to me this is the same it will lead to other ways to fly in space and I seriously think NASA has been over-selling some of the difficulities over the years, because they have made it more difficult through slight ineptitude. As tragic as it is I site launching the Challenger in weather they were told not to launch. So yes it is not a simple thing and yes it is dangerous but so is crossing any street in any city, so is driving on any major road, this is merely a first step, a baby one.
Which is why this event was still undersold in my opinion because it was the first "public" if you will space flight and yes it had some trouble but so did the Mercury capsules when they were first built. So did the Spaceshuttle when it was first built, it will take a long time perhaps but it is a first step. Remember too outside of NASA people have the advantage of not being tied to governmental fixed inside the box thinking and being able to innovate which could lead to public space travel quicker then anyone here realizes.
For the record too I heard they wanted to correct those problems ASAP and try for the X-Prize, that much I heard, have the problems fixed and launch again within 2 weeks time.
[This message has been edited by SCDawg (edited 06-24-2004).]