Starless cannot be legally sold in the states with bestiality, if it could be then you would see bestiality being made and sold in the states like any other fetish but its clearly defined as illegal to be bought and sold in the USA. Owning it and the actually act of bestiality are NOT illegal in all states BUT the sale of it is.
If Jast USA decided to sell it then they can face criminal charges for selling obscene material which bestiality falls under. Why risk it?
[i]“In the United States, zoosexual pornography (in common with other pornography) would be considered obscene if it did not meet the standards of the Miller Test and therefore is not openly sold, mailed, distributed or imported across state boundaries or within states which prohibit it. Under U.S. law, ‘distribution’ includes transmission across the internet.”"
In Armijo v. U.S., 384 F2d 694, The court ruled that portions of letters describing in detail “degenerate bestiality” were not merely obscene but represented hard-core pornography.
The federal code most damaging to zoophiliac freedom is 18 USCS @ 1461, which prohibits obscene books as mailable. In the case U.S. v. Miller 455 F.2d 899, this statute was applied by court to find that books describing bestiality between women and a dog were “unmailable.”
Now remember the Roth Test…So now you know that you can’t mail, import, transport, broadcast, transport, sell, transfer, or distribute via cable or subscription televison, obscene material.
Criminal forfeiture? Guess what, Code 1467 says that the courts can take any property that involved the obscenity law being broken. This could be your VCR, your car, your computer, etcetera. You forfeited them when you used them to break the law.
Presumptions? Code 1469 means that if there is any hint that the material was made somewhere else, be it direct evidence or even circumstantial evidence, then the courts will immediately assume it was transported and therefore violated Code 1462 as well.
"[/i]
JAst needs to think very hard on what it does with Starless, because it could cost them the company.