quote:
Originally posted by SCDawg:
I might be naive but I am convinced if you have the demand for a long running anime you will have a long running anime that last 24-26 maybe more eps. ...
I truly think it is lack of attention span that causes such short running series these days.
The problem is that it's become more financially risky. A 26 episode show is a full season still, in terms of one fact: If the show is 26 episodes it is - by and large - mostly or completely finished with production by the time it airs on TV. Unfortuantely this means that getting 26 episodes from the get-go just isn't for every series anymore because not every show can recoup those costs anymore. Sucky shows are still made - always were, always will be; they just don't lose as much when they're 13 eps instead of 26.
Now, there are a lot of shows that could use another season that don't get it - Kare Kano, for instance, ends at 18 but they drag its undead corpse around for 8 more building up to an event that never happens. Narue no Sekai is only 13 episodes, but it certainly can't actually get anywhere with the episodes it has left. And as far as I'm concerned, Cha Cha should keep on going until the moon crashes into the earth and the gates of hell are open. And so on.
But there are still shows that DO get more episodes. Full Metal Panic! always was 26 - it worked well. Inu Yasha is yet another Takahashi show made into a sprawling epic. Princess Tutu even had an ending at episode 13 but was given a second season (which they actually used to great effect, unlike some shows). Mahoromatic got a second season because it was popular enough. Ghost in the Shell TV was similarly extended due to popularity.
The thing is, when a show is given new life due to popularity, the scheduling is confused. Because there's a gap in production - the show certainly has to be done months before it airs on TV, then after it airs they have to do the negotiations for another season - this is why shows that DO get continuations don't get them right away.
I think I've rambled on long enough, but it's not QUITE as simple as "lack of attention" span. Of course, I've said nothing to DISprove that particular theory, so it could EASILY be that we're both right.